'We didn't refuse homes application...we just just voted not to give it permission,' say council

First published in Romsey

BRAISHFIELD residents have attacked a decision to defer a controversial planning application for affordable homes in their village.

They are bemused and angry that Test Valley councillors voted 13-5 to refuse Hyde Homes’ scheme for nine homes next to the Wheatsheaf pub and minutes later agreed to defer the application after an intervention by head of planning, Paul Jackson.

Mr Jackson advised members to defer the application to allow the developer time to come up with an acceptable design within the tight time limit Hyde had to obtain funding for the homes.

However, some villagers are not happy with the decision-making, including Mike Evans, who said the committee had completely ignored Braishfield’s Village Design Statement (VDS) and the council’s own conservation and design officers, who objected to the development on the grounds that it would be “harmful to the setting” of the village’s conservation area and would “adversely harm” the character of the area.

Mr Evans said: “Our strong objection is that of the proposed location. In planning terms, this site is, we understand, deemed to be ‘countryside’ and normal planning applications would not be allowed to proceed on this land.

“This location just south of the Wheatsheaf, has a gas pipeline further to the south of it, meaning that, unless the Wheatsheaf ceased to be a public house and residential permission was granted on the land, then these nine affordable homes will always be set aside from the rest of the village and not integrated with the rest of the housing settlement.”

After being asked about the voting procedure at the meeting, TVBC issued the following statement: “The planning committee did not vote to refuse the application. The proposal tabled was that the application be granted as per the officer recommendation, but the committee voted not to grant planning permission. Councillors then proposed that the application should be refused.

“At this point, the head of planning and building (Paul Jackson) suggested the committee may wish to defer the decision to allow the applicant to improve the design. Councillors agreed to this approach and deferred subject to the receipt of amended plans to be considered by the committee.”

Mr Evans said he “couldn’t believe” the council’s response.

He told the Advertiser: “To the man in the street, there is very little difference between ‘voted not to grant planning permission’ and ‘refuse an application’, but clearly to the planners there exists a whole world of wriggle room.”

Mr Evans added: “The suggestions made by the head of planning neatly avoided the issue of site location much to the anger of Braishfield residents present and further he prefaced his remarks highlighting the potential loss of funding for the Housing Association, something I note the statement from TVBC fails to mention and is of course not a material planning concern.”

Braishfield Parish Council’s chairman, Mike Prince, believes the application was properly debated.

“I am sure officers acted correctly. They know the planning rules better than you or I do. There is a need for affordable homes in the village and we will now have to wait and see what Hyde Housing comes back with. I hope it gets sorted out soon one way or the other, because it’s causing an atmosphere in the village,” he said.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:53pm Thu 27 Mar 14

rtfmifyoucan says...

Hardly suprising when you consider the unelected Parish Council ignore the villagers opinions. Perhaps the planning app should be deferred until a new PC is elected?

The PC have pushed the AF scheme for 6 years based on old need surveys that fail to consider Abbotswood nor the new Ganger Farm proposals which now make it a new planning considerion.

The Summer 2013 consultation was based on shared ownership none now is proposed.

Re the TVBC adopted VDS, who was it that actualy proposed the adoption of the VDS in 2002? Mr Mike Prince of course... if I recall that other Mike seconded it and it was passed unanimously... Resign all you unelected and co-opted councillors?

Last point, a demonstrable local requiredment for AF has to be shown for exception approval to be given. As TVBC and Braishfield PC are now saying people in Ampfield, Awbridge and Mottisfont and King Sombourne are eligabke, despite them all having there own developments and AF, doesn't say much for local need does it?
Hardly suprising when you consider the unelected Parish Council ignore the villagers opinions. Perhaps the planning app should be deferred until a new PC is elected? The PC have pushed the AF scheme for 6 years based on old need surveys that fail to consider Abbotswood nor the new Ganger Farm proposals which now make it a new planning considerion. The Summer 2013 consultation was based on shared ownership none now is proposed. Re the TVBC adopted VDS, who was it that actualy proposed the adoption of the VDS in 2002? Mr Mike Prince of course... if I recall that other Mike seconded it and it was passed unanimously... Resign all you unelected and co-opted councillors? Last point, a demonstrable local requiredment for AF has to be shown for exception approval to be given. As TVBC and Braishfield PC are now saying people in Ampfield, Awbridge and Mottisfont and King Sombourne are eligabke, despite them all having there own developments and AF, doesn't say much for local need does it? rtfmifyoucan
  • Score: -1

4:11pm Thu 27 Mar 14

rtfmifyoucan says...

Apologies to Mike Prince, he only seconded it, and to the other Mike he just voted for it...
Apologies to Mike Prince, he only seconded it, and to the other Mike he just voted for it... rtfmifyoucan
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree