Benefits move 'would apply equally' (From Andover Advertiser)
When news happens, text AND and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Benefits move 'would apply equally'
1:35pm Monday 4th March 2013 in National News © Press Association 2013
Downing Street refuted suggestions that people may need to show 'entitlement cards' to claim benefits
Any restrictions on health and welfare benefits for immigrants from European Union states would have to apply equally to UK citizens under EU law, Downing Street has acknowledged.
Reports over the weekend suggested that changes could be rushed in before Bulgarian and Romanian citizens gain full rights to move to the UK at the end of the year, amid public concern about so-called "welfare tourism".
Ministers were said to be considering making immigrants wait for up to a year after settling in the UK before being able to seek hospital care including operations, though it is understood that emergency and ante-natal treatment would be excluded from the clampdown.
The proposed changes could form part of a drive to restrict immigrants' access to benefits, council homes and public services. But it is understood that any restrictions would have to be based on residency, rather than nationality, in order to comply with EU laws - meaning that British nationals might also be required to prove their entitlement.
"We have to operate within the law, including EU single market law," Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokesman said. "It is my understanding that one can't discriminate between EU nationalities within that law." However, the spokesman poured cold water on suggestions that people might be required to show "entitlement cards" to prove their right to treatment or benefits, saying that the PM's opposition to ID cards remained "unchanged".
The spokesman said that a Cabinet sub-committee, chaired by the Prime Minister, had met "several" times to discuss the issue of migrants' access to benefits and that it was expected to come to a conclusion "in due course". "There is an ongoing process of discussion of a range of options," the spokesman told a daily Westminster media briefing. "There is the usual process of considering options, but we are not at the announcement stage yet."
Asked what evidence the Government had that welfare tourism was a problem, the spokesman replied: "I think there is a widespread public concern around the pressures around some services, be it housing, local authority services or the NHS. There is a widespread sense of concern and that is what the Government is considering how best to respond to."
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady said: "Alarm bells should be ringing. The concern must be that the Government is set to limit benefits and access to the NHS under the cover of Romanians and Bulgarians gaining the right to work here. The Government must spell out its plans in full detail and come clean on which people living in the UK will lose out. Ministers must also clarify whether those, such as UK pensioners who have moved to Spain, will see their eligibility to health treatment affected too."
Labour immigration spokesman Chris Bryant said: "This Government has spent the weekend flying more kites than Mary Poppins. Managing immigration in a fair way is really important. Yet what we are getting from the Government is just an unseemly reaction to threats from their back benches. In a panicked reaction to Eastleigh they are briefing anything and everything they can think of that they are looking at for the future, instead of properly considered, substantive and deliverable proposals that work for everyone.
"These are important issues and deserve a more considered and coherent approach than that dictated by internal party positioning. People want an immigration system that is fair and simple, with strong controls and secure borders. And they want a system that works. Later this week, the Labour Party will lay out our approach to building an immigration system that works for the whole country."