Hampshire MP speaks out after under-16 social media vote

Kit Malthouse, MP for North West Hampshire, shared his views after Government MPs voted against new measures to restrict social media use for under-16s on Monday, March 9.

The proposals were part of Lords-backed amendments to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which would have raised the "digital age of consent" and introduced a statutory ban on smartphones in schools.

Mr Malthouse said: "This week we called on government MPs to put children first and back our amendments to the Schools Bill.

"Too many young people are being exposed to harmful content online and struggling with the impact of constant smartphone distractions in the classroom."

The Commons rejected the amendments by 307 votes to 173, meaning there will be no legal ban on social media for under-16s or a nationwide ban on smartphones in schools at this time.

Mr Malthouse said: "Last year, I brought together parents, medical experts and charities to look at how we can make Hampshire schools smartphone-free.

"I heard deeply concerning accounts of children not just being distracted by their phones, but experiencing anxiety, serious mental health struggles, and even suicidal thoughts.

"They are being exposed to disturbing online content, including pornography and violence.

"Our proposal is straightforward: raise the minimum age for social media to 16 and introduce a ban on smartphones during the school day."

He argued that these "are practical and proportionate steps that would protect young people and allow them to focus on learning."

Mr Malthouse expressed disappointment with the outcome of the Commons vote but emphasised that the conversation around child protection would continue.

He said: "Sadly, government MPs voted against these measures.

"But this debate is not going away, and I will continue to press for stronger protections for children online and in the classroom."

Supporters of the measures argue that social media and smartphones contribute to rising mental health concerns among children and create significant distractions during the school day.

Opponents, however, have raised concerns about enforceability, potential negative impacts on young people’s digital literacy, and the practicality of a blanket ban.

Mr Malthouse has previously convened meetings with experts, parents, and charities to discuss making Hampshire schools smartphone-free and has promised to continue his campaign despite the parliamentary setback.

He remains committed to pursuing "stronger protections for children online and in the classroom."