Cycleway is waste of money and will lead to conflicts

Cycleway is waste of money and will lead to conflicts

Cycleway is waste of money and will lead to conflicts

First published in Letters

I AM grateful for Andrew Wilson writing in last week (15/8) and for making a very sensible observation.

Cllr Woodward and others at Hampshire County Council/Test Valley Borough Council are aware of this.

In a nutshell, if one in four allegedly use the pavement (illegally as pointed out by Andrew Wilson), then there is only a 25 per cent justification for providing the insane bi-directional cycleway and a 75 per cent reason for retaining the status quo, i.e. leave things as they are (apart from adding the pelican crossing, which seems a good idea).

But I have always challenged the one in four assertion made, allegedly, by the neighbourhood warden who no one on Weyhill Road has ever seen, and if they have, wouldn’t know what she looks like.

If timings are adhered to, work on the bi-directional cycleway starts next month. What a waste of money, not to mention the inevitable conflicts that will happen.

Alan Turner, Weyhill Road, Andover.


Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree